As for value in using new tech, I couldn't turn down a thoughtful conversation. I think it depends on how the tech is used, creatively or lazily. I think when used creatively, it might communicate the artist's mind better, whereas when used lazily the art piece could lack soul (which unfortunately is harder to detect with AI generated stock photos flooding art sharing sites). With strictly traditional mediums, the limits develop creativity, and there's less inherent temptation to slack off. But the choice to use tech depends on the artist, if they truly use it creatively or not.

Unfortunately, some people just want consumer art that looks good on a wall. Our culture lacks a value for craftsmanship and artistry that I think is partially due to technology overshadowing traditional methods. Sorry for the essay, definitely an important conversation.